Oracle11gIFSVSIFFS性能对比

一、说明

成都创新互联专业为企业提供泰州网站建设、泰州做网站、泰州网站设计、泰州网站制作等企业网站建设、网页设计与制作、泰州企业网站模板建站服务,10多年泰州做网站经验,不只是建网站,更提供有价值的思路和整体网络服务。

1、IFS (index full scan) 单块读,IFFS(index fast full scan)多块读。

2、在同时对表中某一列进行全扫描的时候看,多块读的速度明显要比单块读要快,性能要更好。

3、FTS(full table scan)和IFFS(index fast full scan)都为多块读。

4、IFFS(index fast full scan)为多块读,可并行,非排序

5、IFS(index full scan)为单块读、有序。

二、测试过程

SQL> alter system flush buffer_cache;

 

System altered.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.17

SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;

 

System altered.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.30

SQL> select /*+ index(tt idx_object_id) */ count(object_id) from tt;

 

COUNT(OBJECT_ID)

----------------

         5524288

 

Elapsed: 00:00:05.72

SQL> alter system flush buffer_cache;

 

System altered.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.17

SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;

 

System altered.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.07

SQL> select count(object_id) from tt;

 

COUNT(OBJECT_ID)

----------------

         5524288

 

Elapsed: 00:00:01.35

SQL> explain plan for select /*+ index(tt idx_object_id) */ count(object_id) from tt;

 

Explained.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.07

SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display());

 

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 3277332215

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation        | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |               |     1 |     5 | 12269   (1)| 00:02:28 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE  |               |     1 |     5 |         |          |

|   2 |   INDEX FULL SCAN| IDX_OBJECT_ID |  2762K|    13M| 12269   (1)| 00:02:28 |

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

9 rows selected.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.33

SQL> explain plan for select count(object_id) from tt;

 

Explained.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.01

SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display());

 

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 1131838604

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation             | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |             |     1 |     5 |  3335   (1)| 00:00:41 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |               |     1 |     5 |    |          |

|   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IDX_OBJECT_ID |  2762K|    13M|  3335   (1)| 00:00:41 |

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

9 rows selected.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.01

SQL> 


当前标题:Oracle11gIFSVSIFFS性能对比
网页网址:http://csdahua.cn/article/gojcdh.html
扫二维码与项目经理沟通

我们在微信上24小时期待你的声音

解答本文疑问/技术咨询/运营咨询/技术建议/互联网交流